|   | Home > Learn |
![]() In a recent 10 minute game I had 3 min left and my opponent had 1.5 min. I was a pawn ahead in a rook + 6 pawns versus rook + 5 pawns. Instead of trying to improve my position, I shuttled my rook and king around and eventually won on time. My opponent was very critical of this practice, although I told him that even Grandmasters win games in this manner. What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
![]() Yes, I think that computers offer many advantages for improvement. In the abscence of a good tutor, a computer can be a sparring partner, an opening manual, and analysis checker, and the best thing is it doesn't whine or whimper when you beat it! The deep study of Master games is one of the greatest ways to improve, so if your computer has a large database of Grandmaster games, so much the better. Check out the full version of chess.net for windows......it has all these features. |
![]() I know it is good to have your King in the middle of the board during the endgame. But usually all the central pawns are gone and there are only pawns on the side. Shouldn't the king be by the pawns to protect them? |
![]() All the pieces (including the King) have more "scope" and are more powerful in the middle of the board. In one of his books, Gary Kasparov gave a great illustration of why the center is important. He said to consider the center of the board like a tall hill that cascades downward toward the corners. If you were at one corner, you wouldnt be able to see what was happening on the other side, but if you were on top of the hill, you would be able to see everything that was happening on all four corners of "the battle". Also you would be able to react and "get there" swifter from the center than anywhere else on the board. The reason that the king is not on the sides to protect the pawns is that it would be a waste of the king's power to be playing nursemaid for the lowly pawns. The king is a powerful FIGHTING PIECE in the endgame. Use him! |
Till next time, HAPPY CHECKMATING!
---------------BACKSTAB